0 Comments
A new addition to my collection - BART's first 5 car train - composed of 5 prototype A and B cars, at Union City track 1. Taken in December 1970 or sometime in 1971.
Rohr Industries, Inc. Picture, 710828-3 The 1210 reached its end of line a couple weeks ago – the final chapter for a BART car with 50 years of service. It was originally built by Rohr as A car 210 back in 1973, delivered to BART on 3/26/1973, and rebuilt by Adtranz in 2001. As A2 car 1210 it rolled in service until 2023. Since about 2012, the 1210 had a damaged cab – a dark mark towards the bottom center of the fiberglass “pod” indicated such damage. Here is an exclusive look at the final moments of the 1210, given by special permission. Cars arrive at the scrapyard on a truck, and then offloaded using a grabber and a wheel loader with forks. It is a sight to be hold - a 40,000 lb BART car lifted up using those two machines. Inside of the car after being set down. I am a historian at heart, and these cars were rolling museums not too long ago - that is what got me into all this stuff years ago. Of the 59 A2 cars, the 1210 stood out due to its damaged nose - a hole/patch in its fiberglass cab, towards the bottom center. Traditionally, BART has often used the A car nose as a "face" in marketing materials, with the windshield serving as the "eye" - taking advantage of this hole, plus the remains of some type of repair forming a weak "w" pattern, I noted this car as having a "mustache". As a final farewell, for 50 years of service and a little unique damage, I made a little drawing in the cab marking the end. (Note, I do not sharpie any transit vehicles outside these in the scrapyard. I ain't a tagger.) Once we were done, the all clear was given and the car was chopped up minutes later. A sad, but important end to 1210. Parked next to it is 1545. The metals will be recycled and reused, somewhere in the world. Perhaps one day, I'll come across something new, that was made out of said metal from old 1210.
A2 car scrappings resumed this month (October), with 4 such examples thus far: 1218, 1233, 1258, 1270. With some scrapping earlier this year and last year due to crashes, alongside the 1208 of 2020, this leaves 51 A2 cars left (total count was 59 A2 cars). 1218 Built 1973 as A car 218. Rebuilt in 2000 as A2 car 1218. Only A car with single seats. 1233 Built 1973 as A car 233. Rebuilt in 2002 as A2 car 1233. 1258 Built 1975 as A car 258. Final acceptance on 9/11/1975 (Day 1 + 3 years). Rebuilt in 2002. Patch below left cab side window. 1270 Built 1975 as A car 270. Rebuilt in May 2001.
The most recent addition to my number plate collection is a Y end number plate from B2 car 1809. This is the story of the car. Like all other B2 cars numbered 1801-1913, the 1809 was originally built as an A car. In the 1809's case, it was built as A car 237, with a final inspection date of 3/7/1973 and receipt of delivery on 6/26/1973. Roughly speaking it was about the 214th car delivered, of a series of orders totaling 450 revenue cars. Kenneth Clyde Jenkins captured the 237 at Daly City a few times in the mid 1970s. Here are some of his pictures, now in my collection. In the late 1970s to early 1980s, BART Hayward Shop converted 35 A cars to B cars, allowing for longer weekday trains and enough cars for weekend operation. Many of these cars were previously damaged in accidents, fires, or other incidents. It's hard to say at the moment what was the exact reason behind the conversion, but A car 237 was involved in an ATC-related incident at Richmond station on September 30, 1975. The A to B car conversion was underway by 1980 and A car 237 was converted into B car 809 (9th conversion) during this time. From the 1980s to late 1990s, it rolled as B car 809. In total, it rolled about 4 million miles as A car 237/B car 809. The entire remaining A and B car fleet was rebuilt during the turn of the century to allow for another couple decades of service. All B cars were rebuilt into B2 cars, including car 809, which became B2 car 1809 in 2000. The 1809 rolled throughout the system, and in its final years was assigned to Concord and later Richmond yard. I last saw the 1809 at Hayward yard, stored awaiting decommissioning on June 16, 2023. It was decommissioned just a few weeks later, on June 30, 2023 - a few days after reaching 50 years on the property (where it began, and ended at Hayward Yard). A Y-end (once the cab end, when it was an A car) number plate from the 1809 resides in my collection, where it remains as a reminder of a well-traveled, and well-storied BART car.
1218 at Bay Fair Nose of 1235 1235 departing Bay Fair, with its mechanical-only coupler swung out. 1164 at A55 interlocking, bound for Berryessa 1206 and some palm leaves at South Hayward Nose of 1254, with the cab windows open (a common habit of these cars). The cab windows have a tendency to pop open at speed, especially with a change of pressure (e.g. the Tube). Old 1220, rear car at Fremont. Ended the day at the place where it all started 51 years ago, Fremont station, end of line. (Alongside MacArthur, of course).
The new BART schedule rolls out Monday, and with it comes 6 car trains running on 20-minute headways for all lines but the Yellow line, which will have 8 car trains running on 10-minute headways. This article looks into the massive amounts of seat reductions due to this reduction (from 15 min to 20 min) of service and retirement of the legacy cars from scheduled service. To acknowledge, this schedule provides consistent service for weekend riders, who have been stuck with 30 minute service. This new schedule brings it back to essentially pre-covid Saturday service, with slightly longer trains in some instances, for both Saturday and Sunday – a much needed improvement. Additionally, it <may> help to increase safety, if the dope fiend and crackhead fare evaders know they are being watched by a body of civil riders – time will tell. However, BART was not built solely to run trains on weekends. This schedule is better reserved for weekends, and not weekday peaks. The commute period service provided under this new schedule a disservice to loyal BART weekday peak time commuters. As can be seen from my calculations, some if not many riders can expect a reduction of 42% to almost 60% of the seats compared to the trains that ran in August, over the course of an hour. This is absolutely unacceptable during commute hour, in which BART once (e.g. when it was built and until the first few years of operation) promised a seat for nearly every passenger. Such a valiant goal is no longer attainable, but neither is the reality of running a train suited for weekend service during weekday peak commute. These seat reductions are due to shorter trains, alongside retirement of the legacy cars from scheduled service. Perhaps this is a fitting end to the cars – although worn and battered, they had plenty of seats and last ran under a schedule with plenty of trains. (To note, I fully invite corrections to these calculations, but please note that they are not based on “mixed” Legacy and FOTF service, but either or, for simplicity. Still, the message is the same – reduced amounts of seats).
Crowding only looks good on paper – it sucks to stand on your ride to work, let alone going home. Even worse – the media is widely reporting an increase in COVID-19 cases. Long trains encourage social distancing – this is the polar opposite of what should be happening. To add insult to injury, BART has been consistently reducing train sizes these past few weeks – last week had plenty of 8 car Green line trains, and this week has plenty of 6 car train on the Green, Orange, and Blue lines. It’s not even the new public schedule and they are already making people cram in. The lucky yellow line riders will receive a 10-minute headway, receiving a nearly 20% increase in seats. This further puts the burden on everyone else, and those yellow line riders that must transfer to another line. I highly recommend readers to comment on BART media/customer service to bring back longer and more frequent trains during the times in which they are needed most. At some point, if nothing is done, people will realize BART is providing worse service for weekday peak commutes – and may switch to driving. The exact opposite of what BART was designed to do. As I have written elsewhere in the site – BART was designed to not be the twice daily dreg to work. It was faithfully designed to be a rapid transit system suitable for the modern age – a rapid transit system worthy of ridership due to massive considerations designed to provide a comfortable, clean, reliable, convenient, and inexpensive ride to work, school, shopping, recreation, and other activities. BART was not built to provide pitiful service, and we can only hope that BART becomes the system we have so dearly paid for, through the past 60 years. Let's take a look at another random A2 car - this time, the old 1258.
Originally built as A car 258 in 1975, by Rohr, and delivered to BART on June 18, 1975. Things were so bad back then that the final A cars, including 258, were delivered without carborne ATC equipment - they were essentially mothballed right out of the factory. Like many other late A cars, the 258 lost her motors and didn't enter service till the late 1970s. She was rebuily into A2 car 1258 in 2002 by Bombardier, and 21 years later is still rolling around the system on Orange and Red line trains. She has a little patch below the left cab window. |
About
"The Two Bagger" is meant to be a place to store more "blog" style posts on various cars, pictures, and random tidbits. At BART, a "two bagger" is a rather informal name for a two car train. Two car trains rolled in revenue service back in 1972. Archives
November 2023
Categories
All
|